Being a lone stalwart in a digital world of photography
OK, maybe stalwart is probably too strong a word. Though you have to confess it is now unusual to be a user of film cameras and film itself in a world that has taken up digital photography like a fish to water. It makes sense, it’s a reflection of the way we live now. Film itself was a product of consumer convenience and just like Kodak bringing film to the market in the late 19th Century; digital has found a method for us taking photos that fit the majority’s convenience just the same way film did in displacing wet plates and associated processes (although they still live on in pockets.)
So I have been asking myself lately : is it time to get a digital camera, why should I consider it?
The answer is no. I gave it some serious thought with something like the Canon S90 (I have very little time for SLRs, modern ones that is) or similar like the Panasonic LX3. I could use it for snaps and have the convenience of uploading pics, fiddle in Lightroom, and send them down to the lab for my prints. Easy! And yes it is easy and yes I can understand entirely why this suits most people.
There again, I love the simplicity of using film. And that is where my idea of getting a digital camera fell flat on its face.
Digital cameras are simple, but if you want to push them a little beyond the program auto mode, there’s menus and histograms and flash modes and white balance settings, not to mention ISO set through a menu and the aperture (what control you may have) and so forth – and I really cannot be bothered with all that. Some cameras are better at this than some.
What I like about my Leica and Autocord (and by extension OM2n largely) is that I am experience enough to more or less manually meter in my head, I don’t need auto exposure. (I.e. I know on a bright day in the shade or undercover, ISO 400 film that I’m gonna get a good shot at around f/8 1/250th, maybe 1/500th if the shade isn’t too deep. So all I have to do is load the film (easy), and just set by some knobs or rings on the lens my settings and of I trot, focus, snap, focus, snap. I love this. I love the fact that I’m not shouted at by an LCD screen with all the stats reminiscent of a James Bond or Mission Impossible gadget sequence. Colour negative film is so good these days that I don’t need to worry about white balance, and the colour reproduction is great so all I gotta do is meter accurately, that’s it. That’s what I love about my old equipment.
It does of course need some skill and for most people the digital camera is a godsend, making money from photography is probably much easier by using digital in the most common sense e.g. photojournalism, weddings, portraiture etc. But that’s not for me, I like my no fuss antiques!
And here comes the double whammy for me – I love the look of film. Sure you can replicate it in Photoshop, but I like the physical part of the film process, from loading that camera, processing that film and working in the darkroom to make that print with my hands. I like all of that. I like the fact that I can experiment with different processes, from working in colour to looking at doing lith prints.
All of this suits me just fine. I know what computers can be like, so the fact that the worst that can happen is that the enlarger bulb blows or a fuse blows is trivial for me to sort out. If I have a camera problem with the Leica or the Autocord, I can send them off for repair as they are all entirely mechanical with no electronic components that are no longer manufactured. It’s all pieces of metal and parts which with a suitably skilled pair of hands could be recreated.
So in the end for me, the simplicity of it all is a big winner. That doesn’t suit everybody, some people love the histogram and all the other gubbins that helps nail a shot, for me I don’t give a monkeys about any of that as its not my style and my work isn’t critical to my income or reputation – the joy of been an amateur.
If I worked professionally, I could foresee the need for a digital camera but you can bet your bottom dollar the moment I get back home and back into my own thing, film’s the only thing for me. Yes it costs more per shot than digital, but I enjoy the whole process so much it doesn’t matter. 20-40p to develop a film, a few pence literally for a 10×8 RC print (this is including the cost of chemicals) or less than 50p per colour RA4 10×8 print, maybe a bit more for fibre prints – all in all, I’m much happier doing it this way than changing printer cartridges and solving printer driver or paper jam issues.
Though I wish I could solve the issue of having my arm in the way of the enlarger light source when I start a print, d’oh!
This is a personal opinion, if you feel offended by this, please grow a thicker skin and understand I also appreciate your opinion. I’m not trying to change yours.
Written by lilserenity on February 20th, 2010 with no comments.
Read more articles on Computing & Technology and darkroom and Digital and Film and Photography and otherSoftware and Photos.






